剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 性舒荣 4小时前 :

    4,我其实挺意外的是韩寒的泡沫为什么直到这一部才被戳破,实际上他水平一直是稳定的差

  • 府慧月 9小时前 :

    2022/02/17 不难看,但是也没有出彩,韩寒讲故事倒挺流畅观感舒服,但是故事本身实在漏洞百出,相比往作,悲情色彩更露骨浅白,不介意悲剧,但是应该要悲剧得够深刻。大过年得搞这么直白悲剧真是与大众价值背离。。。

  • 戏斯乔 6小时前 :

    韩寒这么多年来,一点长进都没有。而当初吃他那一套的小孩已经长大了,韩寒还是没有任何长进。

  • 凯骞 0小时前 :

    作为摩友来看没有如之前传闻地那样诋毁摩托,剧作方面脱离现实就不去说了,不想说

  • 但永言 5小时前 :

    冊那仿佛在看幾十年前的網路青春文學,想對每一幀鏡頭翻白眼,劉浩存這角色比花瓶還花瓶。

  • 党秋珊 7小时前 :

    感觉韩寒的每一部电影都在讲同一个内核,理想的幻灭,人生的徒劳。我喜欢这种悲剧底色,我也知道它有很多不足,但比起圆滑的成熟,我更喜欢蹩脚的真挚。

  • 律元武 1小时前 :

    没那么好 也没那么差。可能我的新年一直都不怎么喜庆热闹,和男朋友一起看这么个片子也不觉着有什么不妥。他倒是以为“很搞笑”去看了,结果是部有点割裂的文艺片。所以可以说是有点土嗨又有点丧的小作文。

  • 成翱 9小时前 :

    韩寒,你自己瞅瞅你拍的这是个XX玩意儿???情节和水平一致:车祸。

  • 夔晓筠 0小时前 :

    也许某天,它的评分会慢慢上来

  • 卫亚宁 3小时前 :

    为什么要拍Showta哥?

  • 康澄 2小时前 :

    春节档第一部,没有评论的那么难看也没有多好看。小镇海风摩托沿海公路,飙车的场面还有飞跃珠江看的人还是很热血澎湃的。是很韩寒的感觉。就是故事弱了,非要写死女主,以及很多莫名其妙的明星配角没有什么意义。刘昊然的少年感,懵懵懂懂的憨憨样,质朴的让人心疼。女主看出了吴月的感觉。两人没啥cp感。

  • 始雁风 9小时前 :

    怎么说呢…华纳高层评价Amber的那句话可以完美用在刘浩存身上:That's what makes a movie star a movie star...

  • 充语梦 9小时前 :

    前半部该30亿,后半部5亿水平吧。放在春节档,看了就感觉,给自己添堵

  • 房雨筠 2小时前 :

    韩叔,咱以后还是别拍生活随感一般的vlog了,或者你要拍也进行一下艺术加工,也别一直套用你那个家庭不幸、赛车就是理想和归宿、没车祸讲不下去、结局也是悲伤逆流成河的电影叙事模板了。要讲故事就好好讲故事,要表达你对赛车的情感就应该让观众有更多共情,而不是看着它打火启动然后就摔的稀烂…

  • 寅锋 9小时前 :

    韩导彻底摆烂,也罢

  • 家运 8小时前 :

    韩寒最自我的一次表达,(也许差评更多来自于对前两部轻松幽默风格的期待),四海贰字既意味着天大地大的远方,也意味着困住自己无法逃离的孤岛,从第一部电影开始,这似乎是最接近像少年啦飞驰的一部作品,故事里全是离去和消亡,少年困在现实的泥沼里,城市宏大而压抑,这里没有奇迹,没有雄狮。 好虚荣娱乐@CGV颐堤港

  • 微生珍瑞 7小时前 :

    2、和韩寒以前的电影对比,一个我很高兴看到的变化是,他对生活和现实有了更多的关注和思考。在影片后半程,我一度想起了去年让我泪流满面的《雄狮少年》。

  • 尉春柔 2小时前 :

    两星半吧,但是给两星是因为韩导儿没啥进步,还是那样,这剧本最大问题是没有节奏,所以觉得两个多小时特别漫长,还是靠台词投机取巧和莫名其妙的转折推动剧情,还是会忍俊不禁,但笑完又索然无味,有点儿回到后会无期的感觉,但是后会无期是公路片啊,它可以,它不行,

  • 东彬炳 4小时前 :

    如果是春节档看这部电影,绝对会怒打一星,因为这绝不是春节档适合上映的电影。

  • 坚曼珠 0小时前 :

    他们都是一座孤岛,在海浪巨轮,风驰电掣中,突然消失,没有奇迹。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved