Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
近段时间看过的最好的作品，真是一首优雅的挽歌
3.5分 每一个道具都在我的审美点上，但过于煽情和拖沓，故事线过于简单且直白，可能我已经是个肮脏的大人了吧
披着后现代的幌子，讲了一个其实很老套的一体两面自我和解的故事，精致的摄影勾不起人任何的欲望
里面的场景非常高级，有种未来的感觉，题材蛮有现实主义的意义，然而故事对我而言太无趣。
制作美 细致 人物刻画和情感太入微了 温柔的科技
太太太慢了，看了都想睡觉。奥卡菲娜被骂黑人文化挪用是真的有原因，台词一股Rap味，整个人格格不入。
克隆人、面对死亡、身份困惑，都是老生常谈，不过这片好在放弃讲道理，把重点放在描述情绪，很感性，大量面部特写，配合音乐营造氛围，很适合在夜深人静时体会，一个人临终前回忆了自己所有难以言说的情感，看着另一个“自己”鸩占鹊巢，对家人的无私和嫉妒的自私交织，他的符号继续存在于社会，作为一个个体却被遗忘，这可能就是死亡的真相，不管留在身后的是什么都不是真实的“我”。
。。就因为绿皮书纸牌屋来看看…… 他就能演有钱的black dude没有疑问。
总觉得是在看黑镜。梗有点老了，爱和家庭倒是永远值得探讨的主题。就是实在共情不起来：两口子的回忆我不信能一直如此开心和气（俩人唯一的坎儿是失去其他的亲人）
为什么我想起了一本古早言情小说，叫《会有天使替我爱你》
感觉像是淋了一场秋日的小雨，淡淡的惆怅和莫名的忧伤
I love you , always have, and always will, 泪目
四星全给表演，但剧情设定确实需要伦理探讨。
为站在小房间凝视“我爱你”再加一星。是我非常喜欢的主题，但是聚焦点却不在科技与伦理，而是不带judge地展示一个人选择如何离开与被遗忘。It’s hard being left behind，只有狗记得你。爱情本质上还是利己：爱更久，存在更久。我太喜欢马赫沙拉的脸了。结尾正好是圣诞节。🎄🎄🎄
克隆人研究因为伦理问题戛然而止，电影把这个命题放在垂死之人的选择下。若你知道自己生命将至，而生者还有很长的路要走，那么你是否愿意接受被挚爱之人遗忘，独自承受孤独恐惧痛苦，而把欢乐希望幸福留给他们呢？卡梅隆回到家里，看到一切安好，跟孩子和妻子做了最后的告别，那段真的很感人。I love you，always have，and always will
含泪看完了这部Apple TV+出品的电影，真的很感慨，整部电影的节奏十分缓慢但隔着屏幕都能深深感受到男主角在面临抉择时的痛苦和挣扎。如果未来的克隆技术真的发展到电影中的程度，即将死去的人会不会选用克隆人来代替自己来留在爱的人身边🤔
怎么说呢，克隆一个健康的自己替自己活下去并陪伴亲人，脑洞实在是可以。不过都能删除增加记忆了，这世界之大，可供操作的地方之多，估计也就富人能够真正享受到对应福利，而穷人们指不定哪天就被改了记忆，不再像曾经的自己。而且本意也许是好的，但是却也改变了正常的生存伦理，后患无穷
😅在戏剧性和肥皂剧之间还是回归了肥皂剧……
即使身体组成物质相同，思想相同，但那也不是我自己
这个老套设定可以有一百种发展方向，难得的是编剧一种都没选。像是担心剧情哪怕出现一点点的高潮，小心翼翼的，把卡梅隆即将失去一切的，夹杂着希望的绝望，放大，再放大。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
