Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
比第一部叙事要好，可还是乱轰乱炸，场面血腥，让俺一度脸盲。另外，我妈在旁边看的泪流满面，我爸呼呼大睡
没看下去，可能是我的问题，和导演、演员无关。
没有冻不死的英雄，更没有打不死的英雄，只有军人的荣耀！
3.和徐老怪的智取威虎山风格雷同，还不如威虎山好看。
没看下去，可能是我的问题，和导演、演员无关。
水门桥
感觉比上一部拍得好。春节带妈妈去看的。再次对这些战士们敬礼！
我看过的书面材料说柱子炸飞后，桥主体从天而降并搭建，没有达到想象中的震撼
狂轰滥炸两个小时，几乎没有文戏可言，反正就是飞机大炮加机枪，打起来也乱。志愿军同志们牺牲的瞬间很悲惨，场景宏大，能够让观众为之动容。三星，多一星给志愿军和保家卫国的烈士们。
水门桥
和第一部一样，实在太长了，看得快睡着了，无效煽情能不能砍了
美军不管输赢，都是丢人丢到家了，完全不对等的战争，无耻至极。
韩东君被坦克反复碾压的时候，我的心也被碾压了
战火的硝烟，无声的回忆，把全部人打光也要完成任务的勇气和决心……好吧，迟早的事！新中国万岁！
比上一部而言，战斗场面更宏达了，作为一部战争题材的电影，所表现出来的战斗细节不很到位的，唯一的缺点可能就是美军的战斗力偏弱了。
伦敦观影。3.5分，镜头有些过于血腥，人物稍显脸谱化，情节有些单薄
电影惨烈 电影背后的历史更惨烈
那种有必须必须要保护的人
延续了上一集的残酷战争视觉场面，本集愈加变本加厉。火烧活人，坦克轰碎，扫射成渣等等画面数不胜数。电影种种画面再次揭示了战争的本质就是无所不用其极的用所有方式去杀人。为了某个现实目的去死，那叫死得其所，比如保家卫国战争。为了不正当的目的去死，那叫糊涂鬼，比如侵略战争。杀红眼的最终结果就是退化为禽兽本质，西点学霸、战功赫赫、伟大的五星上将麦克阿瑟将军，居然也丧心病狂的试图用原子弹来解决问题。而志愿军的坚硬和不屈，俨然诠释了“谁才是最可爱的人”。江山如此多娇，让人感动的并不是引人折腰，而是每一寸土地，都饱含了我们同胞们的血泪和热爱。
而是懂得了面对战争
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
