Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
火野映司 这个人教会小鸟什么是生命什么是感情什么是朋友 还让Greed为他掉了眼泪 但是最后又留下小鸟自己了
这部剧场版虽说让各位非常难过，但对于我来说不差，因为最后还是结束了😭😭
短了，资金少了点编剧还是之前那样真虐啊，难受死我了，我最爱的一部啊，10年了这个句号太难受了
Greeed人间体的戏份太少了，800王也是，太快被打爆了，像走过场一样，要是能多30分钟就好了
时长短，经费少，故事弱，大纲很不错，拍出来的效果就很差，唯一感动的是原班人马的重聚
没有小林靖子的ooo只能说是低劣的仿制品。整部剧场版就透露着贫穷这两个字，对十周年的纪念作我怎么就抱有期待呢！和朋友吐槽觉得最好看的是几段回忆杀直接放了tv片段，哭死我了并不是因为这部剧场版有多好看，而是我还在小林病院就没出来过…
剧情太快且太刻意。情怀不是那么消费的，Goda附身男主看的我浑身难受
一开始得知OOO有十周年完结篇ankh复活还算是高兴，后续得知剧透映司死了，那我就想着到底看一下他能怎么死，刚刚看完正片，这个完结篇 可以说非常的不满意 ，ankh的复活太过随意，不是说主骑不可以死，但是映司的死太过随意，就是为了死而死，你主打的是情怀牌，可是他妈的，映司本体意识出场都没十分钟，5分钟都没有，情怀个锤子 王复活了 怎么复活的都没说清楚，反派4人组的戏份也不多，无限接近于只露了个脸 正片里还有对TV的回忆杀，直接放的TV片段，你不会以为这就算情怀了吧 我宣布，全篇最燃的地方就是片尾放的tv版OP
这部剧场版虽说让各位非常难过，但对于我来说不差，因为最后还是结束了😭😭
总结:快逃！！这部东西就是一场灾难！
为了剧情而剧情。太过粉丝向，而我只是个路人
这次的十周年真的是情怀拉满，虽然剧情上有点赶。但是主角一班人马全都回归了，还是非常值得庆贺的。填补了十年前的遗憾。虽然结局把我刀傻了。为了这份情怀，我愿意给五颗心。
时长短，经费少，故事弱，大纲很不错，拍出来的效果就很差，唯一感动的是原班人马的重聚
你如果不想让OOO迷悲伤地送他走完最后一程那就不要再设计这么一出悲剧，既然设计了至少把情绪渲染好，最后所有人心中还是留下了不亚于TV结局的遗憾，这次更多的还是无语以及情怀被消费的恼火
冲动型五分。不管怎么说也算是官方给出的一个对于TV结尾的交代了吧，虽然这个交代是天底下令我最痛苦的的一种，而且过程确实没讲清楚，但我现在宣布三个蛋是我这辈子的意难平。
有没有别的骑士能救一下啊 o(╥﹏╥)o
我明白 我们再也不能相见，甚至连名字都喊不出。
感觉有点赶，节奏有点仓促，反派并没有体现出很强大，一个小时的体量到底是不太够呀，不过原班人马都回归 情怀倒是很到位了。
制作方面有些粗糙，但演员们的演绎非常精湛。情怀也是拉到了一个顶峰状态，可惜没能等到观众们都喜爱的结局
这一次映司抓住了安库的手，了结了粉丝的遗憾。再见火野映司，再见假面骑士OOO。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
