朱砂手串鉴别真假

朱砂手串鉴别真假 高清

评分：
9.0 推荐

分类： 喜剧片 2016

导演： 西里斯科什·慕克吉

立即播放 报错
排序

播放地址

剧情介绍

　　喜剧，讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人，周旋于女友和未来岳父之间，因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人，认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
　　Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
　　Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
　　The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
　　Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
　　Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
　　Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
　　In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
　　On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

猜你喜欢

评论:

  • 国晗蕾 3小时前 :

    依然如旧的女性与亲缘母题，细腻明快。不过很难想像在国内社会版上充满狗血的故事会被发散出浪漫的情节，毕竟Ana再次出现弄了个那样的发型我就意识到事情并不简单了。Penélope呢，就还是如此美丽。

  • 律初兰 6小时前 :

    阿莫多瓦这次把自己真正想表达的东西套在了一贯奇情的外壳之下，显得有些笨拙刻意，但是情感又真实动人。什么时候我们也能有历史记忆呢（不敢多说了

  • 婧静 6小时前 :

    3.5。结尾略说教有点减分。但前四分之三表面波澜不惊但内在暗流涌动，剧作和人物心理刻画得真是细致。阿莫多瓦有一种信手拈来随手素描出戏剧性冲突的能力，情绪点游向高潮但故事情节却轻轻放下绝不拖泥带水过度煽情，分寸感和激荡的情感共融一炉。只能感叹大师就是大师。尽管很多缺点，但过人之处其他人就无法企及。同性戏撩得太动情了，直接被Milena Smit圈粉。看了看她的维基才意识到人物可能就是按照她设计的：当演员前，她既当过餐馆服务员，又干过家庭保姆。

  • 妍鹤 5小时前 :

    抱错孩子这个故事，想讲出新意太难了，但想要更狗血阿莫多瓦还是做到了，可惜没能在两个母亲的关系上持续挖掘，反而想要用民族伤痛来为影片加持，最终有点不伦不类。

  • 吾朋义 2小时前 :

    不是也不可能是生涯最佳，但触及政治和历史还是第一次，“历史拒绝沉默”。喜欢这样的电影。

  • 城华乐 5小时前 :

    7.4 情节剧的部分已不再尖锐甚至变得寻常，阿莫多瓦将落笔点转向了对西班牙黑暗年代的回望，故事的契机摇身而变为故事的核心，是母辈的口口相传让罪恶的历史得以重建天日，从而与周遭达成和解并终止悲伤的“平行”，迎来女性的时代，在曾被掩埋的骸骨的瞩目之下。

  • 博运 7小时前 :

    休息的欲望

  • 婷初 5小时前 :

    最后的落点竟然是nerd小男主经过被绑架的事件后愿意使用暴力开始自我认同，然后得到青少年们的某种钦佩orz

  • 亥文姝 1小时前 :

    3.5 尽管题目太大，但色彩、构图、配乐永远不会错。

  • 彦璟 9小时前 :

    四星半。作为最会讲故事的导演，阿莫多瓦此次放弃了细密的情节变奏，转而以节点式的冲突构建更为宏大的叙事主体。人类的行为习惯不断演变，但却会留存于基因之中，一代又一代的传承下去。与此同时，人类的行为习惯所促生的爱欲亲情、杀戮悔恨，也会篆刻于历史之中，永不磨灭。影片中的两位母亲，甚至周遭之人，均有着各自的生活轨迹，但当近乎平行的日常生活有了命运般的转弯，产生交集，异化破裂，世界的黑与白却变得更为清晰。阿莫多瓦以多元的视角，描摹着女性的社会遭遇，深度探讨了女性主义的正反两面，并通过这些孕育出全人类的女性，拷问着历史真相。正如Eduardo Galeano所言，“无论他们如何焚烧它，无论他们如何粉碎它，无论他们如何伪造它，人类历史都拒绝保持沉默。”佩内洛普·克鲁兹奉献了从影以来最出色的表演。

  • 后夏容 2小时前 :

    3.5 太狗血了一点。色彩一如既往的美，但摄影质感实在不喜…

  • 军秀逸 8小时前 :

    看到男孩子们的时候看哭了，很心疼。剧本很完整，小演员的演技也很好，该有的铺垫和伏笔也都有，不明白为什么分这么低。大众对有恐怖标签的电影要求一如既往地高吧，众口难调。如果说缺点就是反派人设不够丰满，动机没有交代清楚，还有不够恐怖吧。

  • 拱初蝶 9小时前 :

    近期看过最好看的电影了。一打开就被吸引住。

  • 刀英耀 7小时前 :

    （豆瓣真空期补标9月末-12月）本来是阿莫多瓦拿手的题材才对~

  • 富察迎丝 9小时前 :

    一段尘封的历史，两个错抱孩子的母亲。男的一眼就看出孩子不是自己的，女的还死犟，还跟另一位母亲搞到一起。越来越看不懂阿莫多瓦的剧情，也就床戏还像那么回事。5

  • 帛婧 6小时前 :

    一次伟大的互文，如果死者没有被安葬，那战争就没有结束。

  • 冯婉容 7小时前 :

    7.0/在这个以文明揭露真相和过去的时代，没有人能拒绝血缘和根源的归属问题。看似不合理的某些情节不是荒诞的，那颗未腐烂的眼球才是违背自然的设定，结果只是为了政治诉求…

  • 徭虹颖 3小时前 :

    应该是有很强的隐喻，母亲与国家。当女摄影师很激动地像年轻的安娜表达不能稀里糊涂地时候，能感觉到导演又不满足于隐喻了，不过不了解她们历史的我还是稀里糊涂了。其实稀里糊涂的人更 幸福，不是么。

  • 怡阳 9小时前 :

    很难理解为什么发现的时候不第一时间去找安娜做个口腔擦拭

  • 康奇 3小时前 :

    “有其父必有其子”，我指的是原著，嘻嘻……

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved