Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
The Rock那个桥段有点意思。典型的迈克尔贝的镜头，大逆光大特写大仰拍。对女性的审美也没什么变化。片子里的世界观还没建好就塌了，很多意图都矫枉过正了。有这些钱砸在不知所云的car chasing上，不如拿去做慈善。
音效多么棒啊，运镜多么晃啊，配乐多么劲啊，飙车和枪战又多么爽啊，我都看出变形金刚的感觉来了。
强烈建议本片无需看IMAX，因为会放大视觉的眩晕感和疲劳，简单看个2D，或者小屏幕观影体验最佳。迈克尔·贝显然不满足于翻拍丹麦电影，个人对影片的痕迹加成，在于他大量手持摄影，和眩晕式剪辑上。他这种略显超前的视听语言，跟娄烨的片子不一样， 他使用了大量观众的主观视角，但并没有带入任何一角色，而是“摄像机本身即是一种视角”，简称摄影机视角。在本片中，我看到了导演对于好莱坞电影语言的颠覆，与此同时，也引发某种生理不适。除了技巧，故事内容本文的不合理和匪夷所思也令人脚扣地板。双兄弟的光环加持，反派人物的仁者无敌，最终败给的不是美国警察和FBI，而是一位普通的急救车护士。更不用说，这位女性形象的主角光环有多强烈，徒手无经验旋转车内做手术等等。但就性别议题，似乎是为了给这个男频向故事，拉拢一些女性受众。
不好看吗？分数低成这样了都，太ib了吧？迈克尔贝动用的警力、抓人的音效、黑人will展现的纠结，在疫情封控期间看看这种片子，多刺激。我个人觉得没什么必要瞎b分析。
啥？什么？danny是唯一坏人，圣母变最大赢家？
恕我直言——虽然很不zzzq，但是能对着自己兄弟后背开枪，Will这个货简直死不足惜。跟这一幕比起来，连前面那些糟糕的无人机镜头都不那么恶心了
一脸问号，这剧本是用脚写的吧！剧情上也无力吐槽了，什么劫匪还要担心是否杀了警察，警察面对人质威胁无动于衷，却为了一条狗喊撤退！
就这还专业抢银行的？这好像随便从菜市场找几个人就过来抢银行来了，威尔这个人物设定太坑了，逻辑上根本说不通……
亡命救护车2022.5.15 看电影之前美国超市枪击案已死10人。两个多小时，故事难圆其说。有些台词不赖。笑着说，我一天天的越来越对这个世界失去信心了。 不管遇到什么情况，保持专注。 富人不喜欢有人嫉妒他们，因为这会让他们感到内疚。 战略，是需要智慧和力量的结合。
除了某场戏和结尾之外，还真挺刺激的。把音量发大，跟随飞舞的镜头，听几首金曲，实在不能更棒。
最后段落甚至有点来自梦与理想年代的一丝涟漪，还不错嘛。
狗屎一样的剪辑，无论是谁都不可能在疾行的车中手术并维持生命
救护车为什么这么多低角度镜头啊，迈克尔贝什么时候这么娄烨了，镜头晃的我都要吐。。。航拍镜头也是乱用一气。大量ECU没有最晃只有更晃。镜头剪的又碎又短，完全破坏观影体验，连完整的追车戏都看不到，卖拷贝是时候少吸点毒了。
撞車還是很爆炸貝，對EMT人員的一首讚歌
6.2分。这是4千万成本拍出来的？？那《蛇眼》那个花了9千万的拍出来的是什么鬼。现在我已经学会怎么看卖拷贝电影了，简单粗暴的方法就是文戏二倍速。因为每多加一分钟文戏就会拖累对整部电影的印象。看卖拷贝就是看人家的爆炸和调度能力的，不过有一说一，这次真的剪得太碎了……完全浪费了灵活的无人机这个（伪）新技术。本以为会有更加有代入感的高速一镜到底，结果还是浅尝辄止，着实令人惋惜。
这个电影看的的时候不要带脑子，因为它压根没逻辑
第一主角我认为是女急救员，她从冷漠的完成工作到最后的变化，是片中拥有最完整的人物弧度曲线的。丹尼是事件的引子，威尔是她产生变化的领路人。当然两兄弟之间的感情也没有落下。
稍微有点冗长，浮夸的镜头设计很难使人保持两个小时的关注度，一些设计还是有点意思的，比如警察帮助修车，不合时宜的约会邀约，被迫要救警察等。但整体人物略显单薄，结局兄弟落网并没有给人以震撼，导演可能为了极致的类型就舍弃掉了一些东西，吉伦哈尔的角色看起来也没有太聪明的样子，前史感觉稍稍有点费。另外吐槽的是音乐的使用太差劲了
本片可以说是近期或者说疫情以来真正的好莱坞大片，虽然故事没多少亮点，但不会沉闷，抢劫枪战家庭情，爆炸追逐兄弟义，该有的都有。
这个电影告诉我们GTA5玩玩就好，别当真。因为GTA6马上要来了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
