A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
剧情毫无逻辑的按着预料之中发展，不过片时太长有点拖沓，精简个半小时就好了。
马修借父子这条线所要传达的理念大抵是:
你以为是男主的人中途就死佐，你以为是大反派的人死得比男主还早。其实如果是反派boss视角的话，这部大概是勇敢的心后传。
给羊的镜头就知道最后肯定有她
拍的些啥，唯一能看的就是俄国妖僧跳芭蕾暴揍主角父子那段
老牌特工拉尔夫父子团vs沙皇座下的creepy monk
打戏还行，和第二部问题一样，主要角色死的太随意了，真的是恶心人！
讲真，我觉得主角是那只山羊，就叫山羊复仇记。
前传比第二集好看太多了。
马修沃恩说不拍X战警续作是防止烂尾，结果没过王牌特工这道坎
如果说 2 代是狗尾续貂的话，这一部就是画蛇添足了。几段故事非常割裂仿佛不是一部片子，强行搞笑的搞基和狗血任务执行也非常出戏像是被片方按头增加商业元素插科打诨。打戏也乏善可陈，芭蕾那段还被用力过猛的搞笑元素毁了。点题经典台词的部分敷衍到令人发指。
男神拉尔夫费因斯演的太好了，慈父与充满智慧的间谍头子完美演绎。好喜欢。
炸弹来了把炸弹引到别人车底害人这是特工干的事啊
近几年看过最一头雾水的外国片。狗尾续貂的“前传”。虚构戏说历史作为娱乐性无可厚非，但是故事的设计毫无结构可言。逻辑性、娱乐性、艺术性………统统都不沾边！希望不要再按照这条故事线继续拍了！
马修沃恩原来之前不翻车都是因为不拍续集 拍了续集翻车两次一次跟头栽的比一次狠 瑞思拜
电影很断裂，三部分就像拼凑而成，一part是成长电影、第二part是军事题材、第三part才是特供片。
给个七分吧，故事太傻逼了。男主的儿子死的真他妈，骂一万次都不够；但男主的这个角色我还是喜欢的，女主也够可爱。剪辑上如果讲单场的话其实都还好，但整个故事的结构还是莫名其妙地割裂。打戏我个人感觉不差。
微微有点扯淡。拉斯普京勾起了奇怪的联想。
所选的时代和美术都不符合马修沃恩电影的杂耍气质，影片的严肃叙事和解构并没有找到平衡，呈现出一种烂却cult的观感，一种怪异的混搭——处理得好就是麦昆，处理不好就是精神小伙
勿喷。先声明我是历史白痴，看电影就看个乐呵，代表一小部分p民。就感觉拍的挺好的。尤其俄国人那段，有k1那味儿。小男主帅的一批，看第一眼就想如此干净的小帅哥之前都被藏哪去了？而且当我以为搞主角光环的时候，小帅哥居然…（不剧透）。还有好几处都挺反套路的。摄影和特效做的都特别好。一直是king‘s man忠实粉丝。k2时候感觉要flop，没想到做前传完全扳回来了。感觉是近期看的院线片里前几名（除去歪曲历史部分）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
