Wealthy Rollo Treadway (Buster Keaton) suddenly decides to propose to his neighbor across the street, Betsy O'Brien (Kathryn McGuire), and sends his servant to book passage for a honeymoon sea cruise to Honolulu. When Betsy rejects his sudden offer however, he decides to go on the trip anyway, boarding without delay that night. Because the pier number is partially covered, he ends up on the wrong ship, the Navigator, which Betsy's rich father (Frederick Vroom) has just sold to a small country at war.
Agents for the other small nation in the conflict decide to set the ship adrift that same night. When Betsy's father checks up on the ship, he is captured and tied up by the saboteurs. Betsy hears his cry for help and boards the ship to look for him, just before it is cut loose.
The Navigator drifts out into the Pacific Ocean. The two unwitting passengers eventually find each other. At first, they have great difficulty looking after themselves, but adapt after a few weeks. At one point, they sight a navy ship and hoist a brightly-colored flag, not realizing it signals that the ship is under quarantine. As a result, the other vessel turns away.
Finally, the ship grounds itself near an inhabited tropical island and springs a leak. While Rollo dons a deep sea diving suit and submerges to patch the hole, the black natives canoe out and take Betsy captive. When Rollo emerges from the ocean, the natives are scared off, enabling him to rescue Betsy and take her back to the ship. The natives return and try to board the ship. After a fierce struggle, Rollo and Betsy try to escape in a small dinghy. It starts to sink, and the natives swiftly overtake them in their canoes. Just when all seems lost, a navy submarine surfaces right underneath them and they are saved.
这类型电影不少 前面其实挺套路
聚焦印度女性权益，整部电影还是比较普通，一惊一乍的bgm和突然的特写显得非常土，女主未婚夫的表演也很不合理，电影立意很有实际意义，但似乎力弱声微，还没有振聋发聩，因为印度的女性人权问题严重而复杂仅凭最后的两行字完全不够。
印度电影好像陷入了一种魔咒，就是先有一个价值观，然后去围绕它来编出一个故事，为了凸显价值观而忽略故事的逻辑性和合理性，哪怕是拍成金福南，我觉的都更好一些。
预告犯的模式，手里有筹码，才能达到自己的诉求，误杀3开工！
意义大于观赏性——当然观赏性是具备的，只是节奏再紧凑点会更好。总之，是部值得看的影片。//但，强烈建议，再等一段时间——目前这个翻译，会让人抓狂。
【印度】能够想到（或是不惊奇）的设计——在类型感十足的外衣里，包裹社会议题的内壳；小孩子也必然不会受到伤害，而是仅指向一个更大的目的与更“理想化”的结果。但它能够最大可能帮助观众粘连在它的进程里，女主角的表演同样从冷漠、疯狂再到心死，所跨越的层次也印象深刻；两部分足够有效并保持到了最后。 银幕里的喊话固然激励人心，但现实依然冰冷却艰难；这般反差所带来的遗憾与唏嘘，或许远远胜于故事本身。
但是后面是真的没想到畜生就是那个司机
7分。绑架只为获得发声的话语权，将强奸搬上台面，唤醒装聋作哑的群众，推动立法。揭露政府腐败堕落，媒体妖言惑众，套路化和节奏掌握的不错。镜头不算突出，偶尔还有突兀的特写推镜头就很尬。
后半段，大型烂俗桥段整合，动画片的弊病应有尽有。这个东西不叫想象力，而是逻辑失衡，从黑镜突然掉到小猪佩奇那种落差。结尾更让人困惑，强行圣母，和电影里“乔布斯”形象的资本家所做的“强买强卖”简直没有区别。最终导致观感骤降，实属可惜。
一部印度乌托邦的电影，不过能拍出来就值5星了！
电影的立意大于电影本身的精彩，节奏拖沓，故事几乎没什么悬念，相比较其他几部印度神作还是稍逊一筹吧
印度的影视作品总有种横冲直撞的气质 不精致但很鲜活
电影水平是三星，加一颗星给不断呐喊的印度电影界，也许他们也能改变法律。
第3463-电影本身是工业化制作及格产品，有意义的是电影的目的是发声呼吁，在网络便利的时代，印度的性侵问题成了全球人都知道的问题，欣慰的是还有不少个体为了法律健全而抗争。
印度版的三年A班，一班学生成了幼儿园小朋友
我只能说，磨磨唧唧，故作悬疑。PS：为什么印度本土电影总是说英文，说几句印度话就要夹杂一句英文，真是让我受不了。
看完之后，觉得可不能让陈思诚、肖央看到这个片，否则就会有《误杀3》了，没准儿还让佟丽娅演。本片以一起人质劫持为导火索，一路揭秘和转折，找出劫匪背后的动机。最终的焦点是同理心，编剧成功玩转了希区柯克的罪孽转移法，对腐败的主流媒体和警察机关进行了精准的打击，展示了印度社会是如何轻视女性问题和心理健康的，虽然有些太过理想主义，但看到最后还是给打了一股强心针。
那些没有加害的人，自以为遮住了眼，捂住了耳朵，袖手旁观就是无罪了。
一部印度乌托邦的电影，不过能拍出来就值5星了！
整个电影的压迫感不及孟买酒店，最大的意外应该就是那个被绑的司机原来就是当年qj女主的罪犯
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
