A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
记得从寻找小糖人开始，每年一部这样的传记电影，可能是对故事背景和原型并不熟悉，但是相较当年蕾妮·齐薇格的《朱迪》还是差太远了吧，人物脸谱化，没有层次，夸张的7-80年代中二造型，毫无质感可言，这届奥斯卡怎么这么寡淡无味啊。
很平很平的那类传记片，甚至有一些桥段和去年的朱迪如出一辙，然而却没了那种感动人的力量，之前朱迪专注了人物的一个状态去描绘，而本片像是流水账，虽然长了，但是也散了。此外劳模姐的表演确实不错，那种爱慕虚荣却又极度自卑的个性，会让你相信这是一个真的人而不是演出。
6.5/10 这些年很常见的女性自我认知和反抗男性枷锁的反杀题材，但是反转请讲基本法
就一个以上地之名行苟且之事的故事，我没看到神迹，没看到祂的爱，也没看到他们对祂的爱，我不知道是因为我迟钝还是因为这电影就是一流水账。。。 @2022-03-17 00:32:36
全程有点懵圈……加菲的嘴唇看着好难受……浓重的眼妆……
其实该扣一星给剧本，工具人好多，挖坑还浅，前半场有种看神棍成长记的错觉。
第94届奥斯卡金像奖 最佳女主角 杰西卡·查斯坦.............安德鲁·加菲尔德好胖啊哈哈
十分美国式的人物传记片，浮华、丰满、恨不得一部电影概括主角人物的一生。每一年奥斯卡大战揭幕之际，总要有一部这样的电影杀出来，剑指表演类的奖项，前两年都是美国传奇性的女歌手，今年变为了更具传奇色彩的女传教士。或许因为文化背景的差异，这样的人物传记电影对于非美国本土的观众来说在人物熟悉上有些困难，更何况这样的一个人物还带有某种宗教性的特征，以至于对待这种类型的电影也只能去看待人物的表演，可偏偏我们对塔米•菲这个人物又不甚了解，所以能评价的意义也变得微不足道。
婚姻是一座围城，艺术家也会不可避免的出现婚姻危机
这个故事其实很一般，就是一对偏执的年轻人，一拍即合联手打天下，在强大的心理暗示下，仿佛都可以成功，这样的个例其实挺多，到最后帝国崩塌，难以做人。但在美国，新教传播就是这么厉害。
重复过八百遍的剧情。卢瑟杀手男，卢瑟男友，卢瑟朋友前男友，卢瑟男友同事，卢瑟男警察，卢瑟超市男经理，甚至那个被陷害的水管工也是一脸卢瑟像。恐男做得很好（性别一换那就叫厌女或恨女，但男性就叫恐男，这叫zzzq），说实话，在这个性别对立越来越严重的世道，我是真心觉得干得漂亮，就让这两个性别隔阂越来越深，跟中西方一样，跟白人黑人黄人一样，跟各大宗教一样，跟阶层一样，大家一起刚到死。
每个鸡血满满的永动机里，都有一颗缺爱的心……
离婚，然后找回自己的生活，是唯一不被杀死的出路。
最后反转太牵强了，明明被割喉流那么多血还能反杀
劳模姐12年看2000年版立刻埋下制作的欲望，这是何等的野心，灾难（行为）艺术家
平平无奇的人物传记奥系八股片，说真的没什么看点，但能了一些不熟悉的人和事也是好的。
影城呼吸，超市黄瓜，招手剪影，衣柜门缝，社交谈资，胶袋头颅，隔壁铃声……“是你太神经质了”“互相体谅一下”难以被男性所理解的女性恐惧，在异国语言的谈笑风生中逐步放大，个中的孤立绝望气氛塑造很不错。但这种第三世界蓝领变态的塑造，是否也属于某种刻板印象？
比较无聊的人物传记，杰西卡查斯坦表演确实很好，颁奖季应该会有所收获。
知道奥奖结果后才看到的片……感觉最突出的是片中她的笑，像极《纽约的一个雨天》里甜茶他哥在讨论未婚妻时说的～听着，能所有兴趣欲望瞬间没了。
四平八稳的传记片，“劳模姐”确实对得起自己这个昵称。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
