逻辑狗网络版和家庭版的区别 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 1992

导演: Catherine Gale

剧情介绍

  A sharp, witty, mind-expanding and exuberant foray into the world of logic with computer scientist Professor Dave Cliff. Following in the footsteps of the award-winning 'The Joy of Stats' and its sequel, 'Tails You Win - The Science of Chance', this film takes viewers on a new rollercoaster ride through philosophy, maths, science and technology- all of which, under the bonnet, run on logic.
  Wielding the same wit and wisdom, animation and gleeful nerdery as its predecessors, this film journeys from Aristotle to Alice in Wonderland, sci-fi to supercomputers to tell the fascinating story of the quest for certainty and the fundamentals of sound reasoning itself.
  Dave Cliff, professor of computer science and engineering at Bristol University, is no abstract theoretician. 15 years ago he combined logic and a bit of maths to write one of the first computer programs to outperform humans at trading stocks and shares. Giving away the software for free, he says, was not his most logical move...
  With the help of 25 seven-year-olds, Professor Cliff creates, for the first time ever, a computer made entirely of children, running on nothing but logic. We also meet the world's brainiest whizz-kids, competing at the International Olympiad of Informatics in Brisbane, Australia.
  'The Joy of Logic' also hails logic's all-time heroes: George Boole who moved logic beyond philosophy to mathematics; Bertrand Russell, who took 360+ pages but heroically proved that 1 + 1 = 2; Kurt Godel, who brought logic to its knees by demonstrating that some truths are unprovable; and Alan Turing, who, with what Cliff calls an 'almost exquisite paradox', was inspired by this huge setback to logic to conceive the computer.
  Ultimately, the film asks, can humans really stay ahead? Could today's generation of logical computing machines be smarter than us? What does that tell us about our own brains, and just how 'logical' we really are...?

评论:

  • 卫克付 7小时前 :

    四舍五入是半个《夜魔侠》第二季剧组了(不是)。金并是律师,罚叔是前科犯,Turk是假释官,你细品……几个熟脸配角所饰演的跟既定印象不同,可惜都有头无尾。

  • 戴千亦 6小时前 :

    桑德拉老成了这样,岁月不饶人那,还是男的抗老。请看基努里维斯。

  • 卜飞航 9小时前 :

    被片名耽误的好电影,不要拿误杀2这样的烂片来做对比,至少也该是跟迫在眉梢一个级别。印度QJ案频发的现状已经让人望而却步,电影以此元素开展的剧情之紧凑完全让人挪不开眼,这一次没有歌舞,没有超长片场,层层递进,高潮频出,真相浮出水面之时就是你大感震撼之际

  • 彬振 7小时前 :

    拍的不好,故事显得狗血了,要不能和曼切斯特差不多吧?

  • 奕恬然 6小时前 :

    女主長得很好看一🌟,希望這部電影可以讓印度的政客覺醒

  • 宇文迎夏 6小时前 :

    打完七发子弹,换弹夹,很真实!

  • 希和煦 2小时前 :

    难怪了难怪了。。。。

  • 寇谷芹 3小时前 :

    讲故事的方式还不错,细节和情感都处理的挺好。

  • 夏冷亦 2小时前 :

    我相信,有时候,我们需要一些走极端的人,因为他们会让那些walk free的人产生惧意。全片的悬疑感营造得很不错,尤其是最后司机的反转,让一切疑点顺理成章,给了女主的动机一个合情合理的解释。

  • 世琰琬 2小时前 :

    故事完整叙事清晰,意料之中又意料之外,好电影

  • 云梅雪 2小时前 :

    丽贝卡·豪尔、诺拉·芬沙伊德和赵婷是这两年让我非常震撼的三名女性导演,她们的发展轨迹也截然不同,后者是大制片人最喜欢的,前者兼备杰出制片人的眼光,本片的导演则是我最期待的真正意义上的硬核导演,在这部预算相对宽裕、卡司朴素且给力、题材中规中矩的影片中,她完美的控制力展现得近乎溢出,那种极具击打感的节奏、调度和用镜头咬住每一个角色攫取他们的气息、压榨他们的情绪,步步紧逼直到最后,真就一个爽字了得

  • 兆明煦 9小时前 :

    但是说不定看故事的我们中的某一个

  • 庹兴发 2小时前 :

    多让人肃然起敬!

  • 凤歌飞 7小时前 :

    正因整个社.会习惯性的对一些声音置若罔闻,有能力者也习惯性的事不关己袖手旁观,才让施暴者总能逍遥法外,而受害者却要承受或许一生都难以愈合的创伤甚至干脆把命赔上。当谈及女人在整个社.会中要面临的处境时,它不仅仅只是女性意识的觉醒,更应该是整个社.会的反思。你希望自己的母亲或女儿能在怎样的环境下生活?希望她们被怎样对待?

  • 叶英豪 0小时前 :

    对美帝无能司法的控诉真棒棒哒。

  • 时姝丽 9小时前 :

    最后法律逻辑上,美国是无罪推定的疑罪从无。并且就算确定了5岁妹妹开枪也大概率就是几年监外执行。

  • 力小翠 9小时前 :

    Since you've started watching this film,as per statistics,8 women have raped in our country.

  • 卫荣涛 8小时前 :

    我不是舔英语,而是从小到大就学英语,听起来总比印度语更加顺耳

  • 公西半香 0小时前 :

    没有选举的地方,老爷们没有这方面担忧。

  • 仪新雪 6小时前 :

    Balling my eyes out… Heads off to all mother figures

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved