A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
文艺罪案片。其实可以不用画像师，就普通刑警也可以
情感展示很细腻，画面也很好，很好的一部电影
画像师也是一个非常特殊的职业，这不仅仅是人物的简单描绘，更是可以讲一个人的精气神透露出来。
现在的死者是当年的凶手，那现在的凶手是当年的……
有几点严重bug，但是完成度还是不错的作为网大比一些院线做得好
摄影很美，截屏收藏了不少，剧情欠佳不够吸引人，人物感情生硬。
类型: 剧情 / 悬疑
三线，芭蕾，照相馆，选背景能力和讲故事能力差的有点多，完全靠侧画师作弊，不如学习一下韩国的侧写师。
比想象中的好太多，虽然片中的文艺气息，能够瞬间将观感拉回到那个年代。但前中期的推进速度，该是稍显缓慢。
编剧和导演都没意识到，影片的情节和表演，还有配乐（八十年代小城市人民剧场舞蹈节目中的《布兰登堡协奏曲》），充斥着残雪式的荒诞疏离感。这要是故意做成的效果，算颇为耐人寻味的。无奈创造者在这方面比较单纯，致使作品充满了诚意和傻气。
摄影很美，截屏收藏了不少，剧情欠佳不够吸引人，人物感情生硬。
悲伤的故事，戏里每个人都活得很悲伤。案件本身的真相反转没那么惊喜，真相揭开之后更显剧中人生之挣扎。镜头色调和光影非常美，国产悬疑里算佳作了，看完觉得还是很值
没理由啊，凭啥要杀林音？和照相那人有啥关系，干嘛嫁祸给他？不好好当库管，成天想着杀人….
与其归类到悬疑片，更像一部文艺片。案件本身并不算复杂，但是观看的过程中经常被忧郁的画面和悲凉的台词转移注意力。人生无奈别离何，一明一暗两位女主，映照着一强一弱两位男主，生命的交替，命运的轮回，故事总是重复地在上演着。
肯定能到3星及格 多一星 鼓励一下 挺好看的
镜头真不错，然而人物塑造是个大问题，加了不少剧情笔墨来塑造人物，然而撑不起这样的台词，反而整得人物有点不对味儿
色调不错 剪辑镜头还不是很到位 感觉应该也是没达到导游心理的样子吧 剧本也单薄
剧情的硬伤还是不少的，比如王队的刻画过于脸谱化，也许编剧想要塑造铁汉柔情的形象，结果呈现出来的却是喜怒无常的角色；再者就是不要老是想着zz正确，为什么非得要女女爱，难道这是高分秘诀？ 最后就是演员的表现力问题了，也许都是新演员吧，即使导演刻意用慢节奏来掩盖不足依然让人出戏。道具的问题就不多说了，一双二十多年前的舞蹈鞋居然还那么崭新？二十年后的凶手跟当年长得一模一样？
好棒！摄影太漂亮啦 故事虽然有点草率但是十分动人
2022 No.188 / nd / nd Last：目中无人
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
