Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
这1，2间隔真久。。都快忘了上一部的剧情了。。。
继续第一部的故事。但后面叙事有点小了。看到结尾，这意思是还有3啊。两部说的是僵尸比很多人类有人性多了的主题。其他的就打打杀杀就完事。还算精彩，风格依旧。
喜剧，现代童话故事。欢笑中带着一丝温情。片中迈阿密的风光真不错。最后老奶奶高歌一曲的时候，真的还是蛮感动人的。给4星有点高了，7分还是应该有的，就凭观后带来的欢乐喜悦心情。
第二部彻底把脑洞打开了啊，新能源丧尸的理念被贯穿始终，当丧尸对人类几乎不再有威胁后，丧尸成了彻底的工具，而这一部则是主要服务于人类阴谋的操纵博弈，各种设定较上一部都延续的很好，废土朋克的风格既粗犷又硬核，照这样子拍下去你说能追赶《生化危机》系列的格局我也不奇怪。
硬核血浆暴干，可惜剧情撑不起来过于干瘪，配乐竟然用了red right hand
僵尸新能源，创意满分，再拍下去mad max都要让位了。
出人意料的还行！末日疯狂脑洞，用丧尸口气发电也太囧了，就很搞笑。
爆米花，僵尸背景下的故事片，僵尸弱到爆，已经沦为压榨能源用了
传统大男人真难顶。最后齐心合力搞好婚礼果趴有点小感动。愿所有专横的人都能设身处地真的为他人着想，阿门
一般吧。有些流于形式，类型片的框架。看了一多半，没心情看下去了
爆米花，僵尸背景下的故事片，僵尸弱到爆，已经沦为压榨能源用了
末日僵尸新能源2，剧情没有第一部反转多，巴里兄妹演了两部应该收工了吧……
为什么都三星，我觉得很朴实无华啊。有钱人的生活就是那么枯燥无味。好吧，其实主要是觉得欧美这种父母与子女的关系很不错。后代人格独立。
猜到了结尾，绝B兄妹丧尸组CP。希望快点出3演员老的快。
非常模式化的家庭喜剧电影，毫无惊喜，看有钱人为鸡毛蒜皮的小事争吵。加西亚大叔依然很有魅力，迈阿密的风景不错～
二是，孤独的老师印象深刻，喜欢学生但又不得，那时候没有社交软件，感觉好可怜。男主的一句预言，希望未来有科学家能发明出找到“同伴”的方法，让大家不再孤独，也预言了现在
没想到这一部狗尾续貂如此之烂！简直无力吐槽。
大门电源线在外面，我直接一个切断，门打不开，反派是不是就饿死在里面了
啊… 怎么说呢…剧情淡淡地又很想看结局，可是呢结局还真的是一个矛盾圈圈，身不由己被辜负的那一个主角真的是单位负他在先、他护爱人在后、最终爱人同事又来处理他
没看过前一部，鉴于现在市面上没有什么丧尸片，随手点开打发时间的，一款白噪音，它确实起到了这个作用。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
