Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
相比剧版来说节奏更慢，情感表达也更细。沟通不能靠魔法，必须亲口将自己的想法告诉对方才行。
这片子多线玩得比较失误的地方就是多线重复剧情太多了，不是加上新的信息量，而是把故事再来讲一遍，拉长了很多不必要的时间，剧情上和前几作几乎是我抄我自己，但是我最喜欢胡闹剧加了一星
3主角团开了天眼和金手指，怎么扯都能圆得过来。当然，总体还是比大部分同题材电影强的，只是没有原来那么惊艳了。
地中海真美啊，跟唐人街探案可以作为系列电影产出对比来看了。延迟反应了半天杰西的红领带。
我还是喜欢古泽良太的脑回路 这部比公主篇好看 但是现在看到东出昌大就生理性恶心 如果有下一部可不可以把他换掉…以及 赤星你怎么了赤星！你醒醒啊赤星！
没有很惊艳，但是不后悔的
麻醬是日本國寶，但這劇本太弱了，懸疑感弱得可以忽略不計，剪輯還把節奏全弄亂了
看行骗天下的唯一目的就是，美景美人和欢乐。
①黑泽无数次自我感动式的将自己的想法隐藏，然后做出一副深情又痛苦的表情，让人无语之余只剩下了审美疲劳…
前面的多视角又过于啰嗦
这一系列已经是戏外多磨大过戏内转折了。惨剧加丑闻让麻妹更显牙白。华丽的助演阵容是不是预示着还会有戏。
年度爽剧又开始啦，经费燃烧得很厉害啊。无脑欣赏马耳他风景快乐
②安达一如既往地可爱，对待工作也很认真，连上司都认可了他的工作，总是考虑别人这点也很温暖
最爱的日剧之一！无论如何反正我达子姐姐不会输！
5）一看安达工作不像话的样子 冒火
对非线叙事审美疲劳了，一段素材可以剪成三次来用。那个像成龙的又出现了
阿部宽真的笑死。。。一张照片就能结个演出费
剧本质量比剧集好了很多，反转反转再细节反转，不过我有点质疑储物室的问题，知道构造也不知道装修吧。剪辑花了功夫，不过2个多小时真的有点长。赤星有一点帅啊~
看完啦！安達真的好可愛好可愛🍒衝首映果然是對的 維持了劇版的高水準 但結尾感覺有點怪 希望是為第二季做準備或是鋪墊
我以为要看到阿部宽了！结果就真的只有一张照片……还有永远只活在彩蛋里的三木律师？感谢还给JC和star安排了一个想象中的戏份，红领带有心了～一切都是那么的完美，有了五郎的加入，真是强强联手啊～
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
