You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
Emma Thompson太迷人了 腹肌电眼翘臀的年轻男孩固然可口 但有趣又有型 每道岁月痕迹, 每个眼波流转都能瞬间传递万千情绪的global treasure才是无可取代
刚好是我的豆瓣#2300 有时候觉得：能和一个人坐着，随便干什么 聊什么，觉得舒服就很好了，很久以来第一次有一个电影精准拍出了这种感觉
为什么…为什么人跟人要通过消费关系才能获得治愈…看的时候总觉得有种不舒服的感觉。
迷人，温馨，适合被改编成舞台剧。赐人愉悦真乃本事和美德。当真身暴露后的矛盾把平静的水面掀翻后，你才会意识到一开始的舒缓，轻柔就是迎着破碎而来的。艾玛汤普森演的仿佛是每个女性时时刻刻面对lustful desire的切面，否定自己的念头，否定自己本身真的很不可爱。你可以有很多很多清单要完成，但认可当下自己才是壮举。悦纳自己的欲望真是一件舒服的事情，两个人没有义务捆绑的探索真是迷人，谁也不需要知道更多一些。能相遇真好。片尾咖啡馆的一场戏也是神来之笔，Becky这个角色写得真好。
太棒的一个电影了！我们不要剥夺身体享受愉悦的权利！大胆的去享受吧！
当然，这样的高质量服务我要来一打！！！！告诉我哪里有？
所以点一次需要多少钱，完美恋人就在付费网站也不是不行
过于明晰而简单，像是一种政治口号的图解。性的交流里怎么会有那么多边界清晰、分寸拿捏恰当的对话。。
片名拗口扣一星，要我说就叫《善解人衣》吧。
太棒了，我希望我认识的所有女性朋友们都看这部电影
挺难评价的。一方面虚伪和傲慢，一方面达利尔真好看。哪有这么多菩萨，不过还是边缘人找自洽。
拍得真的好说教看到后面就“像TED…”。性转一下丧妻男嫖年轻女孩儿还要给人当爹上课最后说其实我也性压抑，就是个毫无被拍摄成电影可能的稀松平常又让人讨厌的事吧。看不出来除了男主的脸和身材有啥好赞美的。
真的很稳。Nancy的角色是对所有被性别角色所捆绑女性的完美折射，焦虑、欲望、失望和恐惧都在行为和言语中暴露无疑。平日被消费的对象反转成为消费的主体，将男性凝视自食其果；但却不仅仅如此，在凝视的基础上还增加了很多层次的阐释和叙述，对性工作者的迷思，不仅来自性别，更与种族身份密不可分。女性的欲望在一次次宛如心理咨询的谈话中被重提，被讨论，只是多了一些实践的层面，满足性幻想和需求。信息量太大，也感觉到导演想要一下次全部展现，有些细节感觉略微操之过急和刻意。4.8/5
演的真好，好多地方笑死。最喜欢藏标签那个镜头，Emma Thompson太可爱了。
剧本太牛逼了，一定是女性写出来的剧本，太懂女性了，以及雕刻出一个现实里绝对不会出现的符合女性幻想的男性形象。艾玛汤普森简直fascinating！！女导演的ig账号一眼误以为铁T（stereotype了私密马赛）其实是个已婚已育十几载的直女，真不错。各个层面爱这个片子。
You have the mysterious gift of being a sex saint. 夸人就要这么夸。
安全词的重要性。
后边的两次会面，在我看来有点过于把买春这件事理想化了。Thompson一厢情愿地去发掘男妓的真实身份，要和他做朋友，实在荒唐……但也许是符合这个角色，是这个天真的老古板干得出来的？和女服务员的对手戏就让我觉得太over，像过于刻意地喊出个口号。
她说“身体只是我们的一个容器”，她让我们看到，即使容器中盛满了一生也可以如此轻盈自由
美好的肉体就是值钱的。这既是现实，又充满了政治不正确。金钱与肉体买卖又怎么可能搭建出平等的对话关系呢，所以这更多只是以一种"理想型"案例在探讨人的欲望、快感、自我接纳及亲密关系等重要话题。而最后的坦诚相见，其实有点shock，因为我们可能甚至于，面对自己都尚未如此直白真诚。两个角色都不是现实主义的角色，也许他们更适合作为一种容器，映射，供我们观想自身，去体悟细微。如果纠结于角色和关系本身的合理性，可能就很难进入这部电影了吧。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
